CALL OF DUTY: Buy Vanguard, or not? The configuration is the greatest obstacle to purchase decisions
CALL OF DUTY: Vanguard was presented a few days ago, but already assessing the trailer is clear: Not everyone is enthusiastic about the new COD of World War and that is also reflected in your opinion.
What's wrong? 6 days ago Call of Duty: Vanguard was announced and finally we know the scenario, which is set in World War II. More information is also announced, including the return of the armored and a launch with 20 complete multiplayer maps.
We wanted to know what you think, the Vanguardmunity, about Call of Duty: Vanguard and its premise and if you will buy the shooter. Here are your answers:
Then you voted: The Call of Duty survey: Vanguard Willingness to Buy ended August 24. A total of 961 community readers voted and each one could only make a vote. The result looks like this:
Are you going to buy Call of Duty: Vanguard?
- Yes, I look forward to: 24%
- Probably if: sixteen%
- I do not know yet: sixteen%
- Better No: 20%
- No, definitely not: 24%
The result shows that the COD community is divided about what to think of the new branch of the series of shots. In the final score, there is a slight tendency to not buy.
more than half is not convinced: Why cod: Vanguard fails with you?
Where did the rejection come from? Not only the Vanguardmunity thinks that Call of Duty: Vanguard is not a mandatory purchase. The reaction of the Youtube community to the first trailer is also evidence of rejection. The reputation of Call of Duty has just taken off in recent years. Modern Warfare 2019 In particular, he was able to earn many ancient and new fans, now the facade is falling apart.
Vanguard trailer has about 15.34% of negative valuations on YouTube and, therefore, is even worse than the trailer of the Second World War (10.4% negative valuations). In Modern Warfare 2019, it is only 3.32% thumbs down. For many of you, it should be clear where the greatest rejection comes from the Call of Duty this year.
Recommended editorial content
At this point, you will find external YouTube content that complements the article.
Show content from YouTube I give my consent to show me external content. Personal data can be transmitted to third-party platforms. Read more about our Privacy Policy. Link to YouTube content
Has the environment exhausted?
I also find the poorly chosen and quite interesting scenario for me. Better buy it to climb the weapons level for the war zone and the campaign.
Dady de.
For indecisive minds, the stage is also at least a small spine on the side:
Well, I'm not looking forward to the scenario of the Second World War. I lost my heavy skins in Cod: WW2, but otherwise it was really good. We have not even seen the multiplayer trailer yet. I think then, at the latest, I know if I want to buy it or not.
Desthen96.
The players who decided to buy Call of Duty: Vanguard are still critical with the scenario:
I have been playing cod from part 1, so Vanguard also remains. Even if the scenario in 2021 becomes more intense than before, the search for zombies Nazis on eternal ice, the moon, etc. Certainly it will be great, you may have preferred a different location. Steampunk, SCIFI, WAR AGAINST IS presented by Wiki Leaks, WW3 2035
ThreePwood.
Gameplay is the most important thing.
Others are not bothered by the environment at all or think that the gameplay of Call of Duty is more important than the surroundings. Some even look forward to the scenario of World War, as our author Maik Schneider. One reason for many of you to buy Cod: Vanguard is the system based on Modern Warfare with arms construction, movement and gun set:
Finally, a COD of the Second World War with decent graphics and probably a good gameplay if it is based on Modern Warfare 2019. How long did we have to wait for this? I hope it is as good as they advertise it too.
VolKeacho.
For me, gameplay is more important than the surroundings. And as Vanguard is based again on MW's gameplay, I look forward to the launch.
HUHU_2345.
You leave the line and wish you infinite Warfare 2
In general, Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare is one of the worst ramifications of the series (through playcentral.de). It has too much science fiction. Movement too fast and too brightness. Criticism at that time were unequivocated and the progress of revelation (through YouTube.com) was already transmitted with almost 4 million thumbs down, completely below Activision expectations.
Even so, some of you would like the developers to be more experimental; As with Infinite Warfare. But what do you have to say in your defense?
In my opinion, the Handles of World War II are simply sucked. In fact, I am always in favor of developers simply have to try something, watch Infinite Warfare. He had so many good approaches, but he was only killed due to the surroundings.
Potato salad
Definitely not. The stage of World War II is so spent that it would even prefer to have an infinite Warfare 2 now, because when you play that today, it is not as bad as it was then. Demons, the way the story is developed in Infinite Warfare is really good. I left at the wrong time.
Bad
Do not you like opinions of others and would like to try Call of Duty: Vanguard before it appears? Soon a playable beta will start and here you can discover how to participate: All about the Beta of Cod Vanguard on September 10: Home, platforms and participation conditions
Comments
Post a Comment